fen
09-26-2008, 02:43 PM
Okay, this may seem nitpicky and silly, but after reading Mike's blog and how he gets annoyed that Protein Power doesn't get mentioned with other low carb diets.. well, I think this:
Calling a diet 'low-carb' 'low-fat' or w/e, while it may in fact contain a low amount of carbs, overall I think anything with 'low' produces a negative connotation because the diet itself basis off of a negative conotation (carbs are bad!) rather than a positive one (like PP makes a positive statement) which is why I think PP better represents a Paleo diet than a 'low carb' (because when I think of low carb I think of fad) and when I think of paleo, the way humans ate for 99% of our history and the time we had the best overall health before the onset of grain agriculture.. so I construe Paleo with a positive rather than a negative. Also, when one goes from simply 'low-carb diet' to 'Paleo diet' it opens a whole new world of looking at all the other lifestyle ways in which humans used to live and enjoy.
oh yeah, it also makes the basis of the diet go from a fad idea, to one based on human evolution, history, and anthropology, rather than todays correlation = causation fallacy diets. (People are overweight because they wear large belts--best analogy ever)
Just my two cents. Any thoughts?
Calling a diet 'low-carb' 'low-fat' or w/e, while it may in fact contain a low amount of carbs, overall I think anything with 'low' produces a negative connotation because the diet itself basis off of a negative conotation (carbs are bad!) rather than a positive one (like PP makes a positive statement) which is why I think PP better represents a Paleo diet than a 'low carb' (because when I think of low carb I think of fad) and when I think of paleo, the way humans ate for 99% of our history and the time we had the best overall health before the onset of grain agriculture.. so I construe Paleo with a positive rather than a negative. Also, when one goes from simply 'low-carb diet' to 'Paleo diet' it opens a whole new world of looking at all the other lifestyle ways in which humans used to live and enjoy.
oh yeah, it also makes the basis of the diet go from a fad idea, to one based on human evolution, history, and anthropology, rather than todays correlation = causation fallacy diets. (People are overweight because they wear large belts--best analogy ever)
Just my two cents. Any thoughts?