<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winners of the Mother Nature ad contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/</link>
	<description>A critical look at nutritional science and anything else that strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Caty Tota</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Caty Tota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 18:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-229</guid>
		<description>You guys are the  best, thanks so much for the help.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are the  best, thanks so much for the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Eades, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R. Eades, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-228</guid>
		<description>In continuing to study the subject, I believe the claims in Slow Burn are even more true, if possible.

I still recommend it above any other form of strength training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In continuing to study the subject, I believe the claims in Slow Burn are even more true, if possible.</p>
<p>I still recommend it above any other form of strength training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R. Eades, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R. Eades, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-227</guid>
		<description>The 15th, eh?  I&#039;ve spent a fair amount of time in the 16th.

In my opinion we have to get enough sunlight of enough intensity to stimulate the production of vitamin D.  That requires 15-20 minutes in the summer with sun on the face and shoulders; it requires forever in the City of Light and other northern climes in the winter.  That&#039;s probably why there is some much more breast, colon, and prostate cancer (vit D responsive cancers) in the north verses nearer the equator.  The RDA of 400 IU is far too little in winter months in the north.  I recommend at least 1000 IU of vitamin D3; 2000 IU would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 15th, eh?  I&#8217;ve spent a fair amount of time in the 16th.</p>
<p>In my opinion we have to get enough sunlight of enough intensity to stimulate the production of vitamin D.  That requires 15-20 minutes in the summer with sun on the face and shoulders; it requires forever in the City of Light and other northern climes in the winter.  That&#8217;s probably why there is some much more breast, colon, and prostate cancer (vit D responsive cancers) in the north verses nearer the equator.  The RDA of 400 IU is far too little in winter months in the north.  I recommend at least 1000 IU of vitamin D3; 2000 IU would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Dr. Eades,

I&#039;ve read The Slow Burn that you co-authored several years ago.  Have any studies since then made the claims in the book any more or less true?  Would you still recommend it?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Eades,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read The Slow Burn that you co-authored several years ago.  Have any studies since then made the claims in the book any more or less true?  Would you still recommend it?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deirdra</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>deirdra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-225</guid>
		<description>It is ironic that the &quot;It&#039;s Not Nice to Fool Mother Nature&quot; ad slogan turned out to be spot on. Whipped transfats are NOT better for you than butter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is ironic that the &#8220;It&#8217;s Not Nice to Fool Mother Nature&#8221; ad slogan turned out to be spot on. Whipped transfats are NOT better for you than butter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon Fellows</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>simon Fellows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Sir a quickie off topic but relative to a Ch in PPL.

Sunlight..is there yet a  rough consensus vis sunlight and its S.A.D preventative capacities and where the  light should shine on the bod ? 
Some sites and articles suggest anywhere on the bod, one suggests the back of the knee and other suggest into the eye.

You folks got any ideas  please ?

Thanks muchly from the city of Lights(in the 15th)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir a quickie off topic but relative to a Ch in PPL.</p>
<p>Sunlight..is there yet a  rough consensus vis sunlight and its S.A.D preventative capacities and where the  light should shine on the bod ?<br />
Some sites and articles suggest anywhere on the bod, one suggests the back of the knee and other suggest into the eye.</p>
<p>You folks got any ideas  please ?</p>
<p>Thanks muchly from the city of Lights(in the 15th)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt Kania</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/winners-of-the-mother-nature-ad-contest/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt Kania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=217#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Actually, Mike, I guessed &#039;Parkay&#039; and not Chiffon.  Full disclosure and all.

But I&#039;ll take the subscription anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Mike, I guessed &#8216;Parkay&#8217; and not Chiffon.  Full disclosure and all.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll take the subscription anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

