<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veganed to death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/</link>
	<description>A critical look at nutritional science and anything else that strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:44:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hodge</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-218264</link>
		<dc:creator>Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-218264</guid>
		<description>The Mayan civilization fell, much like the Roman, Aztec, Byzantine, and pretty much every other major civilization before today. A civilization falling is different than its members dying out, and there are many people today in central America who will attest to their Mayan heritage (or Aztec, or Toltec, etc.) and still live on a similar diet. 

You are wrong in both of your above assertions, however. 

One, subsisting on ribs and chicken is not healthy in any sense of the word. You would be deficient in many nutrients and in fairly short order you&#039;d get scurvy, which would be followed by a host of other malnutrition-induced maladies (not to mention the lack of fiber, making the whole process rather unpleasant). If you were to eat the whole chicken--entrails and all--the deficiency would be somewhat mitigated, but not entirely. A lot of people point to the Eskimos an example of a society that ate only meat, but they also ate a very wide variety of land and sea animals, and they also supplemented their diet with seaweeds and various herbs.

Second, the very definition of a &quot;balanced diet&quot; is what makes it intrinsically healthy. Eating a wide variety of foods from several different groups ensures that you get adequate nutrition without neglecting one nutrient or going overboard on another. Eating all plants may lead to a B12 deficiency, while eating all red meat may lead to an iron overload. 

Basically, there&#039;s nothing &quot;optimal&quot; about a meat-oriented diet (in fact, the &quot;optimal&quot; diet would depend on an individual&#039;s personal biochemistry--you wouldn&#039;t recommend a 12 oz. sirloin steak for dinner every night to someone predisposed towards having high cholesterol). Ignoring the ethical implications, not only is meat incredibly inefficient to produce, but it&#039;s also not good to deprive your body of nutrients that come from plants. These silly fad diets are meant to manipulate lazy people who don&#039;t want to get off their ass and exercise into buying books and partaking in potentially harmful and invariably ineffectual eating behaviors, and I maintain that any doctor who advocates them should be stripped of his/her license for violating the Hippocratic Oath. It isn&#039;t a coincidence that obesity and cardiovascular problems have skyrocketed since Americans began eating a high-meat diet, and it&#039;s sure as hell not the bun on that burger that&#039;s going to make you fat and unhealthy.

&lt;em&gt;I&#039;m not wrong in either of my assertions.  Read Vilhjalmur Stefansson then come back and talk to me about the problems with all-meat diets.  Your comments about exercise reveal a abysmal ignorance of the workings of the energy-balance equation, and the rest of your comment belies any kind of knowledge of the most basic biochemistry (which, BTW, you won&#039;t learn plodding through all the vegetarian pablum out there).  If you instead read the real medical literature, you will learn that the notion that cholesterol is problematic is embodied in the lipid hypothesis, which is just that, a hypothesis, which more and more serious scientists are abandoning because there is no evidence that it&#039;s valid.  If you want to do something worthwhile with your time, instead of parroting all the idiocy you find on the vegetarian sites you spend so many hours perusing, try to find a single serious scientific study published in a reputable journal showing that elevated cholesterol has anything whatsoever to do with heart disease.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;re convinced that it&#039;s important, but just take the time to surf the scientific literature to see for yourself.  Have fun.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mayan civilization fell, much like the Roman, Aztec, Byzantine, and pretty much every other major civilization before today. A civilization falling is different than its members dying out, and there are many people today in central America who will attest to their Mayan heritage (or Aztec, or Toltec, etc.) and still live on a similar diet. </p>
<p>You are wrong in both of your above assertions, however. </p>
<p>One, subsisting on ribs and chicken is not healthy in any sense of the word. You would be deficient in many nutrients and in fairly short order you&#8217;d get scurvy, which would be followed by a host of other malnutrition-induced maladies (not to mention the lack of fiber, making the whole process rather unpleasant). If you were to eat the whole chicken&#8211;entrails and all&#8211;the deficiency would be somewhat mitigated, but not entirely. A lot of people point to the Eskimos an example of a society that ate only meat, but they also ate a very wide variety of land and sea animals, and they also supplemented their diet with seaweeds and various herbs.</p>
<p>Second, the very definition of a &#8220;balanced diet&#8221; is what makes it intrinsically healthy. Eating a wide variety of foods from several different groups ensures that you get adequate nutrition without neglecting one nutrient or going overboard on another. Eating all plants may lead to a B12 deficiency, while eating all red meat may lead to an iron overload. </p>
<p>Basically, there&#8217;s nothing &#8220;optimal&#8221; about a meat-oriented diet (in fact, the &#8220;optimal&#8221; diet would depend on an individual&#8217;s personal biochemistry&#8211;you wouldn&#8217;t recommend a 12 oz. sirloin steak for dinner every night to someone predisposed towards having high cholesterol). Ignoring the ethical implications, not only is meat incredibly inefficient to produce, but it&#8217;s also not good to deprive your body of nutrients that come from plants. These silly fad diets are meant to manipulate lazy people who don&#8217;t want to get off their ass and exercise into buying books and partaking in potentially harmful and invariably ineffectual eating behaviors, and I maintain that any doctor who advocates them should be stripped of his/her license for violating the Hippocratic Oath. It isn&#8217;t a coincidence that obesity and cardiovascular problems have skyrocketed since Americans began eating a high-meat diet, and it&#8217;s sure as hell not the bun on that burger that&#8217;s going to make you fat and unhealthy.</p>
<p><em>I&#8217;m not wrong in either of my assertions.  Read Vilhjalmur Stefansson then come back and talk to me about the problems with all-meat diets.  Your comments about exercise reveal a abysmal ignorance of the workings of the energy-balance equation, and the rest of your comment belies any kind of knowledge of the most basic biochemistry (which, BTW, you won&#8217;t learn plodding through all the vegetarian pablum out there).  If you instead read the real medical literature, you will learn that the notion that cholesterol is problematic is embodied in the lipid hypothesis, which is just that, a hypothesis, which more and more serious scientists are abandoning because there is no evidence that it&#8217;s valid.  If you want to do something worthwhile with your time, instead of parroting all the idiocy you find on the vegetarian sites you spend so many hours perusing, try to find a single serious scientific study published in a reputable journal showing that elevated cholesterol has anything whatsoever to do with heart disease.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re convinced that it&#8217;s important, but just take the time to surf the scientific literature to see for yourself.  Have fun.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hodge</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-217649</link>
		<dc:creator>Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-217649</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the thing: most vegans and vegetarians don&#039;t do it because they believe it to be healthier. A small minority do, and it&#039;s disingenuous to portray them as the norm. The vast majority of non meat-eaters do it for ethical reasons, not because they believe it to be healthier.

Furthermore, the vegan diet will not inherently make you unhealthy. If all you eat is soy and apple juice, then yes, it will, just as it will if all you eat is chicken and ribs. It is certainly more difficult to get all the proteins you need from a vegan diet, but it&#039;s not impossible or even that difficult if you&#039;re fairly intelligent. The Mayan diet was essentially vegan, with only occasional supplementation of meat products, and they didn&#039;t die out. 


I am neither a vegan nor a vegetarian, but this article and many of the comments afterward irritate me. It seems putting forth a logical argument is out of style these days, and one has to mock, misrepresent, and oversimplify things instead to get an audience. 

For instance, you neglect to mention that some plant sources DO contain complete proteins (such as hemp), or that all it takes to get adequate protein intake is to eat protein from a variety of sources. It&#039;s not hard to make some beans to go with your rice or put some nuts in your bread, now is it? 

But then, I guess when you&#039;ve written a bunch of books on a subject you don&#039;t like to admit the competition has any sort of validity. Highly unethical, yes, but then so is promoting low-carb lifestyles in place of healthy, balanced ones. 

If I had it my way, any doctor who promotes fad diets, cosmetic surgery, or other unnecessary/harmful treatments would be stripped of his license for violating the Hippocratic Oath.

&lt;em&gt;Actually, if all you eat is chicken and ribs, you&#039;ll remain quite healthy.  Many people remain on all-meat diets for the long term and do just fine.

I&#039;ve never said that one couldn&#039;t get adequate protein on a vegetarian diet nor have I ever said such diets were disastrous.  I&#039;ve simply said that in my opinion they aren&#039;t optimal.  We should be searching for the optimal diet, not one that is simply adequate.  And, BTW, there is nothing intrinsically healthful about a balanced diet.  You need to brush up on your basic biochemistry and physiology before casting aspersions on others who have done their homework.

What did happen to the great Mayan civilization if it didn&#039;t die out?  It was long gone before the European explorers ever got to it.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing: most vegans and vegetarians don&#8217;t do it because they believe it to be healthier. A small minority do, and it&#8217;s disingenuous to portray them as the norm. The vast majority of non meat-eaters do it for ethical reasons, not because they believe it to be healthier.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the vegan diet will not inherently make you unhealthy. If all you eat is soy and apple juice, then yes, it will, just as it will if all you eat is chicken and ribs. It is certainly more difficult to get all the proteins you need from a vegan diet, but it&#8217;s not impossible or even that difficult if you&#8217;re fairly intelligent. The Mayan diet was essentially vegan, with only occasional supplementation of meat products, and they didn&#8217;t die out. </p>
<p>I am neither a vegan nor a vegetarian, but this article and many of the comments afterward irritate me. It seems putting forth a logical argument is out of style these days, and one has to mock, misrepresent, and oversimplify things instead to get an audience. </p>
<p>For instance, you neglect to mention that some plant sources DO contain complete proteins (such as hemp), or that all it takes to get adequate protein intake is to eat protein from a variety of sources. It&#8217;s not hard to make some beans to go with your rice or put some nuts in your bread, now is it? </p>
<p>But then, I guess when you&#8217;ve written a bunch of books on a subject you don&#8217;t like to admit the competition has any sort of validity. Highly unethical, yes, but then so is promoting low-carb lifestyles in place of healthy, balanced ones. </p>
<p>If I had it my way, any doctor who promotes fad diets, cosmetic surgery, or other unnecessary/harmful treatments would be stripped of his license for violating the Hippocratic Oath.</p>
<p><em>Actually, if all you eat is chicken and ribs, you&#8217;ll remain quite healthy.  Many people remain on all-meat diets for the long term and do just fine.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never said that one couldn&#8217;t get adequate protein on a vegetarian diet nor have I ever said such diets were disastrous.  I&#8217;ve simply said that in my opinion they aren&#8217;t optimal.  We should be searching for the optimal diet, not one that is simply adequate.  And, BTW, there is nothing intrinsically healthful about a balanced diet.  You need to brush up on your basic biochemistry and physiology before casting aspersions on others who have done their homework.</p>
<p>What did happen to the great Mayan civilization if it didn&#8217;t die out?  It was long gone before the European explorers ever got to it.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan Bagwell</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-214457</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan Bagwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-214457</guid>
		<description>I get more entertainment from comments on this blog... (funny stuff, if not a tad sad)

What a tragedy, though, that poor tiny baby withering away; makes me ill thinking about it.  I&#039;d know something was up if my baby was only 3 lbs., but I do get lots of fat to help me think.

I guess that&#039;s why soy milk cartons have a warning on the side now not to use in place of infant formula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get more entertainment from comments on this blog&#8230; (funny stuff, if not a tad sad)</p>
<p>What a tragedy, though, that poor tiny baby withering away; makes me ill thinking about it.  I&#8217;d know something was up if my baby was only 3 lbs., but I do get lots of fat to help me think.</p>
<p>I guess that&#8217;s why soy milk cartons have a warning on the side now not to use in place of infant formula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerhardt J. Steinke</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-167827</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerhardt J. Steinke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-167827</guid>
		<description>Any discussion having logical sufficiency needs to DEFINE frequently misused terms such as terms such as &quot;low-fat&quot; and &quot;vegan&quot; that take on a multitude variety of meanings. Using one case of ignorant &quot;vegan&quot; parents should not be applied to the majority of vegans who have SOME understanding of the merits of SCIENTIFIC optimal VEGAN diet. Similarly with all too many arguments about &quot;low-fat&quot; diets. Thirty per cent of calories from fat is NOT low fat.  Duh.  Ditto with badly misnamed &quot;low-fat&quot; milk. If the Dairy business was not in bed with the USDA, the badly outmoded scheme of referring to fat content by volume or weight would not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any discussion having logical sufficiency needs to DEFINE frequently misused terms such as terms such as &#8220;low-fat&#8221; and &#8220;vegan&#8221; that take on a multitude variety of meanings. Using one case of ignorant &#8220;vegan&#8221; parents should not be applied to the majority of vegans who have SOME understanding of the merits of SCIENTIFIC optimal VEGAN diet. Similarly with all too many arguments about &#8220;low-fat&#8221; diets. Thirty per cent of calories from fat is NOT low fat.  Duh.  Ditto with badly misnamed &#8220;low-fat&#8221; milk. If the Dairy business was not in bed with the USDA, the badly outmoded scheme of referring to fat content by volume or weight would not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malachi Constant</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-90660</link>
		<dc:creator>Malachi Constant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-90660</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; No vegan societies??? From 1976-1988 the National Institutes of Health funded a study
&gt;&gt; of 34,000 California Seventh Day Adventists (who subscribe to a strict vegetarian diet).
&gt;&gt; The study concluded that the average Adventist lived 4-10 years longer than the
&gt;&gt; average Californian. If you don’t believe me read all about it in
&gt;&gt; National Geographic (November 2005).

Ed, there are no vegan societies. He meant traditional societies on a national or subnational level, that&#039;s why the only society that was cited as non-vegan was Indian. I don&#039;t doubt that the California Seventh Day Adventists lived longer than the typical Californian, but one must also remember that in a large group, alternative diets are safer - people can tell you if you clearly have a deficiency. People in this church would certainly be able to help each other with it if they were all lifelong vegans. However, these two parents probably didn&#039;t have their son around many other people at all - malnutrition to the point of starvation is NOT difficult to spot.

Dietary aspects aside, people in a church like the Seventh Day Adventists (which appears pretty strict) are more likely to live longer simply because they&#039;re missing out on all the sex, drugs, and rock n&#039; roll that all the other Californians are getting in on ;)

&gt;&gt; Or you can just keep claiming that we “need” to meat to get protein without supporting
&gt;&gt; it with any statistics. The fact is that the average vegan lives longer than the average
&gt;&gt; omnivore which leads you to the logical conclusion that a vegan diet is optimal for humans.

He didn&#039;t say you needed meat to survive, he just said you needed protein from animal sources - in fact, he didn&#039;t even really say that, but it&#039;s implied that it&#039;s ideal. Here, I&#039;ll quote him: &quot;Humans need protein, vitamin B-12, and other nutrients that come from meat, or at least eggs and dairy products.&quot; The NIH study you cited does not prove conclusively that the average vegan lives longer, it proves that the Seventh Day Adventists in California live longer than the average Californians.

&gt;&gt; To suggest that humans eat more like rats or raccoons (true omnivores) than gorillas
&gt;&gt; (herbivores who share over 95% of our DNA) is patently absurd.
The closest evolutionary ancestor of ours is not the gorilla, but the chimpanzee. The diet of the chimp varies very widely and they have been known to kill many kinds of small animals to get meat. Some are nearly vegetarian, but the vegetarian chimps get protein through eating insects, so they&#039;re not entirely without animal matter.

&gt;&gt;You may be surprised to know that Dr. Benjamin Spock, the world’s foremost expert
&gt;&gt;pediatrician who wrote Baby and Child Care (one of the best selling books of all time) 
&gt;&gt;recommended a vegan diet for children in his final edition. Another thing you can look up.
&gt;&gt;But what we he know??
What we he know? I dunno what we he know. I do know what I know, though. I put on weight when I flirted with veganism and I felt like crap. That&#039;s anecdotal evidence, but it was what determined that I was on this side. I&#039;m not concerned with the experience of Dr. Spock, because, although he was very accomplished in his field, his advice doesn&#039;t change the fact that I feel better when I have a lot of fat and protein in my diet. Tell you what, if you stop telling people that eating meat is a toxic travesty, I&#039;ll ignore you vegans withering away as I munch quietly on my T-bone steak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; No vegan societies??? From 1976-1988 the National Institutes of Health funded a study<br />
&gt;&gt; of 34,000 California Seventh Day Adventists (who subscribe to a strict vegetarian diet).<br />
&gt;&gt; The study concluded that the average Adventist lived 4-10 years longer than the<br />
&gt;&gt; average Californian. If you don’t believe me read all about it in<br />
&gt;&gt; National Geographic (November 2005).</p>
<p>Ed, there are no vegan societies. He meant traditional societies on a national or subnational level, that&#8217;s why the only society that was cited as non-vegan was Indian. I don&#8217;t doubt that the California Seventh Day Adventists lived longer than the typical Californian, but one must also remember that in a large group, alternative diets are safer &#8211; people can tell you if you clearly have a deficiency. People in this church would certainly be able to help each other with it if they were all lifelong vegans. However, these two parents probably didn&#8217;t have their son around many other people at all &#8211; malnutrition to the point of starvation is NOT difficult to spot.</p>
<p>Dietary aspects aside, people in a church like the Seventh Day Adventists (which appears pretty strict) are more likely to live longer simply because they&#8217;re missing out on all the sex, drugs, and rock n&#8217; roll that all the other Californians are getting in on <img src='http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&gt;&gt; Or you can just keep claiming that we “need” to meat to get protein without supporting<br />
&gt;&gt; it with any statistics. The fact is that the average vegan lives longer than the average<br />
&gt;&gt; omnivore which leads you to the logical conclusion that a vegan diet is optimal for humans.</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t say you needed meat to survive, he just said you needed protein from animal sources &#8211; in fact, he didn&#8217;t even really say that, but it&#8217;s implied that it&#8217;s ideal. Here, I&#8217;ll quote him: &#8220;Humans need protein, vitamin B-12, and other nutrients that come from meat, or at least eggs and dairy products.&#8221; The NIH study you cited does not prove conclusively that the average vegan lives longer, it proves that the Seventh Day Adventists in California live longer than the average Californians.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt; To suggest that humans eat more like rats or raccoons (true omnivores) than gorillas<br />
&gt;&gt; (herbivores who share over 95% of our DNA) is patently absurd.<br />
The closest evolutionary ancestor of ours is not the gorilla, but the chimpanzee. The diet of the chimp varies very widely and they have been known to kill many kinds of small animals to get meat. Some are nearly vegetarian, but the vegetarian chimps get protein through eating insects, so they&#8217;re not entirely without animal matter.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;You may be surprised to know that Dr. Benjamin Spock, the world’s foremost expert<br />
&gt;&gt;pediatrician who wrote Baby and Child Care (one of the best selling books of all time)<br />
&gt;&gt;recommended a vegan diet for children in his final edition. Another thing you can look up.<br />
&gt;&gt;But what we he know??<br />
What we he know? I dunno what we he know. I do know what I know, though. I put on weight when I flirted with veganism and I felt like crap. That&#8217;s anecdotal evidence, but it was what determined that I was on this side. I&#8217;m not concerned with the experience of Dr. Spock, because, although he was very accomplished in his field, his advice doesn&#8217;t change the fact that I feel better when I have a lot of fat and protein in my diet. Tell you what, if you stop telling people that eating meat is a toxic travesty, I&#8217;ll ignore you vegans withering away as I munch quietly on my T-bone steak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-59816</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-59816</guid>
		<description>Notice that MRE did not respond to any point that I made in my comment! Instead he chooses to ridicule and ignore.  What kind of forum is this?  Not very intelllectual at all.  Well i&#039;ll let him off since he can not refute the NIH study I cited nor the professional experience of Dr. Benjamin Spock.  Not to mention the conclusions of the China Health Study which I encourage all of you to look up.

&lt;em&gt;Hi ed--

I could refute them all, but what&#039;s the point?  Is there anything I could possibly say that would change your mind?  I seriously doubt it because your mind is already made up.  So why should I spend time and effort refuting a bunch of easily refutable material when it won&#039;t change your mind and would be otherwise pointless since the vast majority of the people reading this site haven&#039;t bought into the vegetarian hogwash as you have?  It&#039;s simply a matter of best use of time.

Cheers--

MRE&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that MRE did not respond to any point that I made in my comment! Instead he chooses to ridicule and ignore.  What kind of forum is this?  Not very intelllectual at all.  Well i&#8217;ll let him off since he can not refute the NIH study I cited nor the professional experience of Dr. Benjamin Spock.  Not to mention the conclusions of the China Health Study which I encourage all of you to look up.</p>
<p><em>Hi ed&#8211;</p>
<p>I could refute them all, but what&#8217;s the point?  Is there anything I could possibly say that would change your mind?  I seriously doubt it because your mind is already made up.  So why should I spend time and effort refuting a bunch of easily refutable material when it won&#8217;t change your mind and would be otherwise pointless since the vast majority of the people reading this site haven&#8217;t bought into the vegetarian hogwash as you have?  It&#8217;s simply a matter of best use of time.</p>
<p>Cheers&#8211;</p>
<p>MRE</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-58284</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-58284</guid>
		<description>No vegan societies???  From 1976-1988 the National Institutes of Health funded a study of 34,000 California Seventh Day Adventists (who subscribe to a strict vegetarian diet). The study concluded that the average Adventist lived 4-10 years longer than the average Californian.  If you don&#039;t believe me read all about it in National Geographic (November 2005).  Or you can just keep claiming that we &quot;need&quot; to meat to get protein without supporting it with any statistics.  The fact is that the average vegan lives longer than the average omnivore, which leads you to the logical conclusion that a vegan diet is optimal for humans.  To suggest that humans eat more like rats or raccoons (true omnivores) than gorillas (herbivores who share over 95% of our DNA) is patently absurd. As for the vegan parents who malnourished their baby to death...the baby didn&#039;t die from veganism it died from a poor unbalanced diet selected by 2 idiot parents who happened to be vegan.  How many omnivorous babies die every year in the USA?  But I guess &quot;Meat Eating Parents Kill Baby&quot; isn&#039;t such a sensational headline for the media.  There is something that scientists call annecdotal evidence.  For the scientifically illiterate out there that means trying to make a point using one case or story.  In science it is totally worthless.  For example, I could say I knew a guy who smoked 2 packs a day and lived to age 105, therefore smoking is probably not so bad for us.  Such a statement is absurd because it refutes volumes of hard data to the contrary. Nina Planck&#039;s editorial is guilty of making the same type of point with one annecdote about one pair of vegan parents....VERY UNSCIENTIFIC.  You may be surprised to know that Dr. Benjamin Spock, the world&#039;s foremost expert pediatrician who wrote Baby and Child Care (one of the best selling books of all time) recommended a vegan diet for children in his final edition.  Another thing you can look up.  But what we he know?? Probably not as much as Nina Planck (a food writer and self-professed &quot;expert&quot; on farmers&#039; markets who is promoting her new book).  what a joke!

&lt;em&gt;What a bizarre comment.  I&#039;ll put it up as is so that anyone reading can observe the thought processes of a vegan in action.

Cheers--

MRE&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No vegan societies???  From 1976-1988 the National Institutes of Health funded a study of 34,000 California Seventh Day Adventists (who subscribe to a strict vegetarian diet). The study concluded that the average Adventist lived 4-10 years longer than the average Californian.  If you don&#8217;t believe me read all about it in National Geographic (November 2005).  Or you can just keep claiming that we &#8220;need&#8221; to meat to get protein without supporting it with any statistics.  The fact is that the average vegan lives longer than the average omnivore, which leads you to the logical conclusion that a vegan diet is optimal for humans.  To suggest that humans eat more like rats or raccoons (true omnivores) than gorillas (herbivores who share over 95% of our DNA) is patently absurd. As for the vegan parents who malnourished their baby to death&#8230;the baby didn&#8217;t die from veganism it died from a poor unbalanced diet selected by 2 idiot parents who happened to be vegan.  How many omnivorous babies die every year in the USA?  But I guess &#8220;Meat Eating Parents Kill Baby&#8221; isn&#8217;t such a sensational headline for the media.  There is something that scientists call annecdotal evidence.  For the scientifically illiterate out there that means trying to make a point using one case or story.  In science it is totally worthless.  For example, I could say I knew a guy who smoked 2 packs a day and lived to age 105, therefore smoking is probably not so bad for us.  Such a statement is absurd because it refutes volumes of hard data to the contrary. Nina Planck&#8217;s editorial is guilty of making the same type of point with one annecdote about one pair of vegan parents&#8230;.VERY UNSCIENTIFIC.  You may be surprised to know that Dr. Benjamin Spock, the world&#8217;s foremost expert pediatrician who wrote Baby and Child Care (one of the best selling books of all time) recommended a vegan diet for children in his final edition.  Another thing you can look up.  But what we he know?? Probably not as much as Nina Planck (a food writer and self-professed &#8220;expert&#8221; on farmers&#8217; markets who is promoting her new book).  what a joke!</p>
<p><em>What a bizarre comment.  I&#8217;ll put it up as is so that anyone reading can observe the thought processes of a vegan in action.</p>
<p>Cheers&#8211;</p>
<p>MRE</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karmyn</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-32273</link>
		<dc:creator>Karmyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 16:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-32273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a vegan with a 5 week old son. I breastfeed him and he&#039;s thriving.  He was 7lbs 10 oz when he was born, and at his last checkup 2 weeks ago, weighed 8 lbs 9 oz.  Since human milk is designed for human babies, that is all he will get until he starts solids and weans himself off the breast at his own leisure.

The parents in the article were irresponsible and whether they were vegan or omni, that is what should be emphasized.

&lt;em&gt;Hi Karmyn--&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;You didn&#039;t ask for my advice, but I&#039;ll give it to you anyway.  Keep him on the breast for at least a year.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Cheers--&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;MRE &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a vegan with a 5 week old son. I breastfeed him and he&#8217;s thriving.  He was 7lbs 10 oz when he was born, and at his last checkup 2 weeks ago, weighed 8 lbs 9 oz.  Since human milk is designed for human babies, that is all he will get until he starts solids and weans himself off the breast at his own leisure.</p>
<p>The parents in the article were irresponsible and whether they were vegan or omni, that is what should be emphasized.</p>
<p><em>Hi Karmyn&#8211;</em></p>
<p><em>You didn&#8217;t ask for my advice, but I&#8217;ll give it to you anyway.  Keep him on the breast for at least a year.</em></p>
<p><em>Cheers&#8211;</em></p>
<p><em>MRE </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hickman</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-30858</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hickman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 01:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-30858</guid>
		<description>Jesus H -- I never imagined that this could be such fun.  I sure would like to pull up alongside a few of these folks and have a peek through the driver&#039;s side window just to see what they look like.

&lt;em&gt;Me too. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus H &#8212; I never imagined that this could be such fun.  I sure would like to pull up alongside a few of these folks and have a peek through the driver&#8217;s side window just to see what they look like.</p>
<p><em>Me too. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/veganed-to-death/comment-page-1/#comment-30622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=716#comment-30622</guid>
		<description>During a three month vegan stint last year, I learned two things:

- Many vegans (about half of them) are hypocritical, stupid, and malicious.
- Many omnivores (about half of them) are hypocritical, stupid, and malicious.

The diet one chooses has little or nothing to do with that person&#039;s intelligence. Many vegans (about half of them) are just trying live their lives in a way that they understand to be healthy and more compassionate. Because they are wrong about the health &quot;benefits&quot; does not make them malicious.

Were these particular parents stupid? Absolutely. But any omnivore who uses a few isolated incidents to judge all (or even most) vegans is simply ignorant.

To this day it pains me to hear people badmouth vegans, as if all vegans support PETA, preach to strangers, burn down animal testing facilities, and maliciously starve their children to death. I still consider myself to be &quot;mostly vegetarian,&quot; though I&#039;d never admit it to anyone without the relative anonymity of the Internet. I can do without the sneers and judgment, thanks.

I would hope that an M.D. like yourself could be a little less critical of the misinformed.

&lt;em&gt;Hi Ben--&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Point taken.  But, if you must know, I&#039;m only hypercritical of the of the 50 percent of them who are &quot;hypocritical, stupid, and malicious.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;I have no problem with anyone&#039;s being a vegetarian; what I have a problem with is their constant harping that the vegetarian lifestyle is the most healthful.  The evidence is there for anyone to see that it isn&#039;t, so when they go on about, I feel compelled to point out that they are idiots.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Cheers--&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;MRE &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a three month vegan stint last year, I learned two things:</p>
<p>- Many vegans (about half of them) are hypocritical, stupid, and malicious.<br />
- Many omnivores (about half of them) are hypocritical, stupid, and malicious.</p>
<p>The diet one chooses has little or nothing to do with that person&#8217;s intelligence. Many vegans (about half of them) are just trying live their lives in a way that they understand to be healthy and more compassionate. Because they are wrong about the health &#8220;benefits&#8221; does not make them malicious.</p>
<p>Were these particular parents stupid? Absolutely. But any omnivore who uses a few isolated incidents to judge all (or even most) vegans is simply ignorant.</p>
<p>To this day it pains me to hear people badmouth vegans, as if all vegans support PETA, preach to strangers, burn down animal testing facilities, and maliciously starve their children to death. I still consider myself to be &#8220;mostly vegetarian,&#8221; though I&#8217;d never admit it to anyone without the relative anonymity of the Internet. I can do without the sneers and judgment, thanks.</p>
<p>I would hope that an M.D. like yourself could be a little less critical of the misinformed.</p>
<p><em>Hi Ben&#8211;</em></p>
<p><em>Point taken.  But, if you must know, I&#8217;m only hypercritical of the of the 50 percent of them who are &#8220;hypocritical, stupid, and malicious.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>I have no problem with anyone&#8217;s being a vegetarian; what I have a problem with is their constant harping that the vegetarian lifestyle is the most healthful.  The evidence is there for anyone to see that it isn&#8217;t, so when they go on about, I feel compelled to point out that they are idiots.</em></p>
<p><em>Cheers&#8211;</em></p>
<p><em>MRE </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
