<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My morning horoscope and HDL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/my-morning-horoscope-and-hdl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/my-morning-horoscope-and-hdl/</link>
	<description>A critical look at nutritional science and anything else that strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rita</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/my-morning-horoscope-and-hdl/#comment-49516</link>
		<dc:creator>Rita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 23:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=234#comment-49516</guid>
		<description>You all suck because a good diet is not exclusive to fat and carbs I think the way food is cooked, how it is prepared, and even what it is served with makes up a &quot;truly&quot; good diet.  If the medical experts have it with HDL levels and their correlation to high fat foods my husband would have dropped dead on the worksite as an aquaintance did two weeks ago, who is significantly thinner than my husband and probably had a meager diet.  I follow the food pyramid and if I cut anything out ; the processed canned goods go first.  They say less this and less that but in actuality your&#039;e getting more of something else or alot of nothing.
I think you should all rub my feet.

&lt;em&gt;Hello

You wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;...a good diet is not exclusive to fat and carbs I think the way food is cooked, how it is prepared, and even what it is served with makes up a &quot;truly&quot; good diet.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And this is based on what research?  What training?  What reading of the medical literature?  Or maybe you&#039;ve taken care of thousands of patients on diets, that&#039;s it, right?

Or is it just your opinion based on the fact that you just feel that way?

If so, thanks for sharing.

MRE

&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all suck because a good diet is not exclusive to fat and carbs I think the way food is cooked, how it is prepared, and even what it is served with makes up a &#8220;truly&#8221; good diet.  If the medical experts have it with HDL levels and their correlation to high fat foods my husband would have dropped dead on the worksite as an aquaintance did two weeks ago, who is significantly thinner than my husband and probably had a meager diet.  I follow the food pyramid and if I cut anything out ; the processed canned goods go first.  They say less this and less that but in actuality your&#8217;e getting more of something else or alot of nothing.<br />
I think you should all rub my feet.</p>
<p><em>Hello</p>
<p>You wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;a good diet is not exclusive to fat and carbs I think the way food is cooked, how it is prepared, and even what it is served with makes up a &#8220;truly&#8221; good diet.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>And this is based on what research?  What training?  What reading of the medical literature?  Or maybe you&#8217;ve taken care of thousands of patients on diets, that&#8217;s it, right?</p>
<p>Or is it just your opinion based on the fact that you just feel that way?</p>
<p>If so, thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>MRE</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/my-morning-horoscope-and-hdl/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=234#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Interesting is the horoscope and even interesting is the way you see it :D
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting is the horoscope and even interesting is the way you see it <img src='http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Dodge</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/my-morning-horoscope-and-hdl/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=234#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Did you notice the results of the RUTH study that were announced today? http://www.medadnews.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=330933 

&quot;EVISTA did not increase or decrease the combined endpoint of non-fatal heart attack, fatal heart attack, and hospitalized acute coronary syndrome compared to placebo.&quot; 

As Evista was previously found to lower total cholesterol by 7% and the dreaded LDL by 11%, Eli Lilly spent huge sums to prove that it would lower heart risk. It ends up showing (again) that lowering LDL does NOT reduce heart risk, despite all propaganda that low LDL is the magic cure.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice the results of the RUTH study that were announced today? <a href="http://www.medadnews.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=330933" rel="nofollow">http://www.medadnews.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=330933</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;EVISTA did not increase or decrease the combined endpoint of non-fatal heart attack, fatal heart attack, and hospitalized acute coronary syndrome compared to placebo.&#8221; </p>
<p>As Evista was previously found to lower total cholesterol by 7% and the dreaded LDL by 11%, Eli Lilly spent huge sums to prove that it would lower heart risk. It ends up showing (again) that lowering LDL does NOT reduce heart risk, despite all propaganda that low LDL is the magic cure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/uncategorized/my-morning-horoscope-and-hdl/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike_blog/?p=234#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Woohoo!  Thanks for the information!  I learn so much reading here.

That does help explain (besides the exercise I did) why my HDL skyrocketed on the Atkins diet - my fat intake was fairly high.  My HDL went from 45 to 74, driving my total cholesterol up a bit because the LDL dropped by less than the HDL rose.

If fat drives HDL up, what is it about exercise that also raises it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo!  Thanks for the information!  I learn so much reading here.</p>
<p>That does help explain (besides the exercise I did) why my HDL skyrocketed on the Atkins diet &#8211; my fat intake was fairly high.  My HDL went from 45 to 74, driving my total cholesterol up a bit because the LDL dropped by less than the HDL rose.</p>
<p>If fat drives HDL up, what is it about exercise that also raises it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
