<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Observational studies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/</link>
	<description>A critical look at nutritional science and anything else that strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AHHURA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are we meat eaters or vegetarians? Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-313369</link>
		<dc:creator>AHHURA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are we meat eaters or vegetarians? Part I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-313369</guid>
		<description>[...] What I realized right off the bat is that his whole shtick is nothing but an epidemiologic or observational study, which, as Iâ€™ve written about in these pagesÂ  before, proves no causality and serves only to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What I realized right off the bat is that his whole shtick is nothing but an epidemiologic or observational study, which, as Iâ€™ve written about in these pagesÂ  before, proves no causality and serves only to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ny folder: Vetenskap och evidens i kostfrÃ¥gan &#124; info</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-308257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ny folder: Vetenskap och evidens i kostfrÃ¥gan &#124; info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-308257</guid>
		<description>[...] Observational studies &#8230; read more.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Observational studies &#8230; read more.. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blog of Michael R. Eades, M.D. &#187; Statins and diabetes</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-302675</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blog of Michael R. Eades, M.D. &#187; Statins and diabetes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-302675</guid>
		<description>[...] were observational studies and, as such, can&#8217;t be used to determine causality.  But they are interesting nonetheless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were observational studies and, as such, can&#8217;t be used to determine causality.  But they are interesting nonetheless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paleo explained - Mythbusting &#124; The Paleo Recipe Book Review</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-251395</link>
		<dc:creator>Paleo explained - Mythbusting &#124; The Paleo Recipe Book Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-251395</guid>
		<description>[...] on correlations that don&#8217;t even existÂ in the underlying data that he cites fromÂ observational studies. The popular media hasnâ€™t yet caught on, but scienceÂ has called bullshitÂ on &#8220;The China [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on correlations that don&#8217;t even existÂ in the underlying data that he cites fromÂ observational studies. The popular media hasnâ€™t yet caught on, but scienceÂ has called bullshitÂ on &#8220;The China [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meat and Mortality &#124; Health is a Gift! &#124; Health, Medicine, Disaseas, Cures, Fitness, Women Health, Men Health</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-251260</link>
		<dc:creator>Meat and Mortality &#124; Health is a Gift! &#124; Health, Medicine, Disaseas, Cures, Fitness, Women Health, Men Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-251260</guid>
		<description>[...] this study is totally worthless from a causality perspective because it is an observational study, it does serve to confirm the biases of those non-critical thinkers who have already bought into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this study is totally worthless from a causality perspective because it is an observational study, it does serve to confirm the biases of those non-critical thinkers who have already bought into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Forks Over Knives&#8221; is Fame Over Fact</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-251143</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Forks Over Knives&#8221; is Fame Over Fact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-251143</guid>
		<description>[...] in the end it is still only an observational study.Â  And even though â€“ again, according to Dr. Campbell â€“ there are over 8000 statistically [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the end it is still only an observational study.Â  And even though â€“ again, according to Dr. Campbell â€“ there are over 8000 statistically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meat and Mortality &#124; Best Health</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-250570</link>
		<dc:creator>Meat and Mortality &#124; Best Health</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-250570</guid>
		<description>[...] this study is totally worthless from a causality perspective because it is an observational study, it does serve to confirm the biases of those non-critical thinkers who have already bought into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this study is totally worthless from a causality perspective because it is an observational study, it does serve to confirm the biases of those non-critical thinkers who have already bought into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing wrong with Observational Studies. And Association does Imply Causality butâ€¦ &#171; Richard David Feinman</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-250526</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing wrong with Observational Studies. And Association does Imply Causality butâ€¦ &#171; Richard David Feinman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-250526</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, the great deconstructions of crazy nutritional science &#8212; several from Mike Eades blog and Tom Naughtonâ€™s hysterically funny-but-true course in how to be a scientist &#8211;Â  are still [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, the great deconstructions of crazy nutritional science &#8212; several from Mike Eades blog and Tom Naughtonâ€™s hysterically funny-but-true course in how to be a scientist &#8211;Â  are still [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meat and Mortality &#124; by the pines</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-250487</link>
		<dc:creator>Meat and Mortality &#124; by the pines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-250487</guid>
		<description>[...] this study is totally worthless from a causality perspective because it is an observational study, it does serve to confirm the biases of those non-critical thinkers who have already bought into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this study is totally worthless from a causality perspective because it is an observational study, it does serve to confirm the biases of those non-critical thinkers who have already bought into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Correlation is not Causation &#124; Urban Crossfit</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statistics/observational-studies-2/comment-page-4/#comment-248686</link>
		<dc:creator>Correlation is not Causation &#124; Urban Crossfit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2266#comment-248686</guid>
		<description>[...] Observational Studies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Observational Studies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

