<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A bookish blog post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/</link>
	<description>A critical look at nutritional science and anything else that strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-227078</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-227078</guid>
		<description>I also enjoy book, movie, tv show reviews so hope you will continue listing yours.  

What I don&#039;t enjoy is R or X rated material (not that any of these have that...I&#039;m just sayin). It&#039;s just so disappointing to hear of a popular best seller and then it be filled with continuous &quot;f&quot; bombs. At least if I&#039;m aware beforehand I could select something else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also enjoy book, movie, tv show reviews so hope you will continue listing yours.  </p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t enjoy is R or X rated material (not that any of these have that&#8230;I&#8217;m just sayin). It&#8217;s just so disappointing to hear of a popular best seller and then it be filled with continuous &#8220;f&#8221; bombs. At least if I&#8217;m aware beforehand I could select something else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-214413</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-214413</guid>
		<description>What a great post. I&#039;ve been addicted to reading ever since I was 5 years old - a far healthier obsession that being addicted to carbs! And I&#039;ve been a fan of British crime fiction since discovering both Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle when I was eleven years old. 

I&#039;ve being reading Peter Robinson for years, though not read the most recent one you talk about. I swear in one of the author&#039;s notes for a previous book he thanked all the medical staff who took care of him after (I believe) a heart attack - so I would not be the least surprised if he is on statins himself. 

I have not read any of the other authors you mention, so may have to take a look. I certainly loved the book about Lucy which I read of here. I love reading the other comments too, and seeing references to other favorites like Rex Stout, Tony Hillerman, and Neal Stephanson&#039;s &#039;Cryptonomicon&#039;. Overall the British crime novels are my favorites, but I also love the Lydia Chin/Bill Smith mysteries by S.J. Rozan, set in NYC. and lately I&#039;ve been on a kick of discovering and reading the Myron Bolitar mysteries by Harlan Coben. I guess I get a kick out of the fact that Myron was raised, and lives in, Livingston, NJ - my daughter-in-law&#039;s home town (and apparently author Coben&#039;s home town as well) , and where she and my son currently live. I get a kick out of all the local references and love to exclaim, &quot;Oh wow! I know that place!&quot; Plus the books are well-written and often very funny. :-)

In the interests of financial necessity, and the fear of my small 1899-vintage house imploding from the weight of all the books and bookcases, I&#039;ve begun using the library more often. It can be hit or miss sometimes, but I&#039;ve enjoyed being exposed to a wider variety of books without any financial commitment. But of course if I totally love a book I end up having to buy it anyway, along with all its brothers and sisters, so I&#039;m not sure how much money (or wall space) I&#039;m actually saving, LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great post. I&#8217;ve been addicted to reading ever since I was 5 years old &#8211; a far healthier obsession that being addicted to carbs! And I&#8217;ve been a fan of British crime fiction since discovering both Agatha Christie and Arthur Conan Doyle when I was eleven years old. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve being reading Peter Robinson for years, though not read the most recent one you talk about. I swear in one of the author&#8217;s notes for a previous book he thanked all the medical staff who took care of him after (I believe) a heart attack &#8211; so I would not be the least surprised if he is on statins himself. </p>
<p>I have not read any of the other authors you mention, so may have to take a look. I certainly loved the book about Lucy which I read of here. I love reading the other comments too, and seeing references to other favorites like Rex Stout, Tony Hillerman, and Neal Stephanson&#8217;s &#8216;Cryptonomicon&#8217;. Overall the British crime novels are my favorites, but I also love the Lydia Chin/Bill Smith mysteries by S.J. Rozan, set in NYC. and lately I&#8217;ve been on a kick of discovering and reading the Myron Bolitar mysteries by Harlan Coben. I guess I get a kick out of the fact that Myron was raised, and lives in, Livingston, NJ &#8211; my daughter-in-law&#8217;s home town (and apparently author Coben&#8217;s home town as well) , and where she and my son currently live. I get a kick out of all the local references and love to exclaim, &#8220;Oh wow! I know that place!&#8221; Plus the books are well-written and often very funny. <img src='http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In the interests of financial necessity, and the fear of my small 1899-vintage house imploding from the weight of all the books and bookcases, I&#8217;ve begun using the library more often. It can be hit or miss sometimes, but I&#8217;ve enjoyed being exposed to a wider variety of books without any financial commitment. But of course if I totally love a book I end up having to buy it anyway, along with all its brothers and sisters, so I&#8217;m not sure how much money (or wall space) I&#8217;m actually saving, LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ursa Major</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213933</link>
		<dc:creator>Ursa Major</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213933</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of polled climatologists “97.4% believe that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures.” The figure drops down to 80% for all Earth Scientists who took the poll, compared to about half of the American public. None of the above represent a consensus, but apparently the more you know about global warming the more likely you are to believe we’re causing it…&quot;

An alternative interpretation: the more your livelihood and research depends on institutional and governmental funding, the more likely you are to support the consensus belief, whether it&#039;s true or not. A decision was made a decade or more ago by global governments and foundations that anthropogenic global warming is the crisis of our lifetimes; any climatologist who bucks that trend tends to be professionally ridiculed or unemployed, or at the very least have his/her projects unfunded. The surprising statistic isn&#039;t that 97.4% of climatologists support the theory; it&#039;s that 2.6% admit that they don&#039;t; I&#039;m guessing those are the ones with tenure and/or near retirement. The same has been true in the nutritional field with the lipid v. carbohydrate/insulin hypothesis; it&#039;s been professional suicide for decades for researchers to come right out and deny the lipid hypothesis, despite the weight of the evidence.

Dr. Mike, please post your book reviews, they&#039;re much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of polled climatologists “97.4% believe that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures.” The figure drops down to 80% for all Earth Scientists who took the poll, compared to about half of the American public. None of the above represent a consensus, but apparently the more you know about global warming the more likely you are to believe we’re causing it…&#8221;</p>
<p>An alternative interpretation: the more your livelihood and research depends on institutional and governmental funding, the more likely you are to support the consensus belief, whether it&#8217;s true or not. A decision was made a decade or more ago by global governments and foundations that anthropogenic global warming is the crisis of our lifetimes; any climatologist who bucks that trend tends to be professionally ridiculed or unemployed, or at the very least have his/her projects unfunded. The surprising statistic isn&#8217;t that 97.4% of climatologists support the theory; it&#8217;s that 2.6% admit that they don&#8217;t; I&#8217;m guessing those are the ones with tenure and/or near retirement. The same has been true in the nutritional field with the lipid v. carbohydrate/insulin hypothesis; it&#8217;s been professional suicide for decades for researchers to come right out and deny the lipid hypothesis, despite the weight of the evidence.</p>
<p>Dr. Mike, please post your book reviews, they&#8217;re much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Maltzman</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213633</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Maltzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 08:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213633</guid>
		<description>By all means, post more book reviews and recommendations.  I enjoy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all means, post more book reviews and recommendations.  I enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213558</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213558</guid>
		<description>Of polled climatologists &quot;97.4% believe that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures.&quot;  The figure drops down to 80% for all Earth Scientists who took the poll, compared to about half of the American public. None of the above represent a consensus, but apparently the more you know about global warming the more likely you are to believe we&#039;re causing it...
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature)

I fear that such a near-consensus may someday be reached regarding the health impacts of sugar and starch, but then a debate ensues for decades because the affected industries keep cranking out bogus studies and hiring &quot;expert opinion&quot; to cloud public opinion and prevent positive change.  

People in general don&#039;t need much encouragement to resist change keep doing what they like doing (burning energy like crazy and eating junk), so stifling progress is much easier than getting it to happen.  I hope our kids understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of polled climatologists &#8220;97.4% believe that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures.&#8221;  The figure drops down to 80% for all Earth Scientists who took the poll, compared to about half of the American public. None of the above represent a consensus, but apparently the more you know about global warming the more likely you are to believe we&#8217;re causing it&#8230;<br />
(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change#Surveys_of_scientists_and_scientific_literature</a>)</p>
<p>I fear that such a near-consensus may someday be reached regarding the health impacts of sugar and starch, but then a debate ensues for decades because the affected industries keep cranking out bogus studies and hiring &#8220;expert opinion&#8221; to cloud public opinion and prevent positive change.  </p>
<p>People in general don&#8217;t need much encouragement to resist change keep doing what they like doing (burning energy like crazy and eating junk), so stifling progress is much easier than getting it to happen.  I hope our kids understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenice Szemere</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213502</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenice Szemere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213502</guid>
		<description>Mike, off-topic because it is TV not books, but have you come across the British series called &quot;Spooks&quot; (I think it is shown in the USA but it is called MI5 and I gather broadcast at some obscure time. according to reviews on Amazon, the reviewers also recommend buying it from Amazon UK as it is much cheaper.

It&#039;s one of the best spy shows I have ever seen (well, almost, Tinker Taylor was exceptional)

Glenice

&lt;em&gt;Haven&#039;t seen it, but it sounds good.  I did watch a number of episodes of a Brit series called Sandman (I think), which was pretty good.  I&#039;ll take a look for Spooks.  Sounds right up my alley.  Thanks&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, off-topic because it is TV not books, but have you come across the British series called &#8220;Spooks&#8221; (I think it is shown in the USA but it is called MI5 and I gather broadcast at some obscure time. according to reviews on Amazon, the reviewers also recommend buying it from Amazon UK as it is much cheaper.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the best spy shows I have ever seen (well, almost, Tinker Taylor was exceptional)</p>
<p>Glenice</p>
<p><em>Haven&#8217;t seen it, but it sounds good.  I did watch a number of episodes of a Brit series called Sandman (I think), which was pretty good.  I&#8217;ll take a look for Spooks.  Sounds right up my alley.  Thanks</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213418</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213418</guid>
		<description>My previous comment was an implied &quot;yes&quot; vote, This one is the explicit &quot;yes&quot; vote, just so it gets counted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My previous comment was an implied &#8220;yes&#8221; vote, This one is the explicit &#8220;yes&#8221; vote, just so it gets counted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213416</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213416</guid>
		<description>I am in a state of wonderment at not seeing Tony Hillerman&#039;s name mentioned. His mystery novels set in the Navajo &quot;Big Res&quot; with Tribal Policeman Jim Chee and Sargent Joe Leaphorn; they are books I cannot put down once I start. He writes great thrillers set in the Big Res, and he brings in some Navajo folk lore as he goes along. It was sad that Hillerman died a short while ago, not least of all, because he will not write any more books. 

BTW, I think you are far too kind and gentle with Al Gore. I will be buying your latest book as soon as it is available. I was sorry to see it bumped from May until September. 

BTW2, Anthony Watts has a great web site on Global Climate at http://wattsupwiththat.com/.
He has not drunk the AGW kool-aid, and presents very good, up-to-date information. He is coordinating a review of the temperature recording sites throughout North America, and other places. Many, far too many, of these sites collect garbage rather than data.

&lt;em&gt;I love Tony Hillerman and his books.  MD and I got to spend some time with him 15 years or so ago.  I didn&#039;t mention him because I was discussing books I had just read, not all the books I had ever read.  Hillerman&#039;s books are a great way to learn about Navaho culture.  Highly recommended, especially if you&#039;re ever going to be traveling in New Mexico.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in a state of wonderment at not seeing Tony Hillerman&#8217;s name mentioned. His mystery novels set in the Navajo &#8220;Big Res&#8221; with Tribal Policeman Jim Chee and Sargent Joe Leaphorn; they are books I cannot put down once I start. He writes great thrillers set in the Big Res, and he brings in some Navajo folk lore as he goes along. It was sad that Hillerman died a short while ago, not least of all, because he will not write any more books. </p>
<p>BTW, I think you are far too kind and gentle with Al Gore. I will be buying your latest book as soon as it is available. I was sorry to see it bumped from May until September. </p>
<p>BTW2, Anthony Watts has a great web site on Global Climate at <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wattsupwiththat.com/</a>.<br />
He has not drunk the AGW kool-aid, and presents very good, up-to-date information. He is coordinating a review of the temperature recording sites throughout North America, and other places. Many, far too many, of these sites collect garbage rather than data.</p>
<p><em>I love Tony Hillerman and his books.  MD and I got to spend some time with him 15 years or so ago.  I didn&#8217;t mention him because I was discussing books I had just read, not all the books I had ever read.  Hillerman&#8217;s books are a great way to learn about Navaho culture.  Highly recommended, especially if you&#8217;re ever going to be traveling in New Mexico.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve G</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213288</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 05:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213288</guid>
		<description>Dr Mike, thanks for the book ideas!

I walk about 40 miles a week and use that time to listen to audiobooks and podcasts. I am a huge fan of audiobooks, it&#039;s such a great combination of exercising and entertainment.

One of the most memorable audiobooks I listened to was Shantaram http://www.amazon.com/Shantaram-Novel-Gregory-David-Roberts/dp/0312330529

It&#039;s an autobiographical novel based on a true story of an Australian prisoner who escaped to India. It seems to be unforgettable for me.

I would love it if you started a podcast. An hour a week with some guests and callers would be very cool.

&lt;em&gt;I started reading Shantaram a few months ago and left it on a plane (I think - I really don&#039;t know where it is, so that&#039;s what I assume).  I haven&#039;t gotten around to picking up an other copy and getting back into it.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Mike, thanks for the book ideas!</p>
<p>I walk about 40 miles a week and use that time to listen to audiobooks and podcasts. I am a huge fan of audiobooks, it&#8217;s such a great combination of exercising and entertainment.</p>
<p>One of the most memorable audiobooks I listened to was Shantaram <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shantaram-Novel-Gregory-David-Roberts/dp/0312330529" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Shantaram-Novel-Gregory-David-Roberts/dp/0312330529</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s an autobiographical novel based on a true story of an Australian prisoner who escaped to India. It seems to be unforgettable for me.</p>
<p>I would love it if you started a podcast. An hour a week with some guests and callers would be very cool.</p>
<p><em>I started reading Shantaram a few months ago and left it on a plane (I think &#8211; I really don&#8217;t know where it is, so that&#8217;s what I assume).  I haven&#8217;t gotten around to picking up an other copy and getting back into it.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/statins/a-bookish-blog-post/#comment-213280</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 04:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/?p=2910#comment-213280</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the truth about cholesterol ratios? According to the mainstream, my 234 total cholesterol is high, but my HDL is 63 and my ratios are fine. However, your blogroll buddy at Heart Scan Blog writes this about ratios: http://is.gd/wfLD &quot;By the way, the so-called &quot;ratios&quot; (i.e., total cholesterol to HDL and the like) are absurd notions of risk. Take weak statistical predictors, manipulate them, and try to squeeze better predictive value out of them. This is no better than suggesting that, since you&#039;ve installed new brakes on your car, you no longer are at risk for a car accident. It may reduce risk, but there are too many other variables that have nothing to do with your new brakes. Likewise cholesterol ratios.&quot;

If total cholesterol says little or nothing about cardiac health, and cholesterol ratios say little or nothing about cardiac health, why even bother having cholesterol levels checked in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the truth about cholesterol ratios? According to the mainstream, my 234 total cholesterol is high, but my HDL is 63 and my ratios are fine. However, your blogroll buddy at Heart Scan Blog writes this about ratios: <a href="http://is.gd/wfLD" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/wfLD</a> &#8220;By the way, the so-called &#8220;ratios&#8221; (i.e., total cholesterol to HDL and the like) are absurd notions of risk. Take weak statistical predictors, manipulate them, and try to squeeze better predictive value out of them. This is no better than suggesting that, since you&#8217;ve installed new brakes on your car, you no longer are at risk for a car accident. It may reduce risk, but there are too many other variables that have nothing to do with your new brakes. Likewise cholesterol ratios.&#8221;</p>
<p>If total cholesterol says little or nothing about cardiac health, and cholesterol ratios say little or nothing about cardiac health, why even bother having cholesterol levels checked in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
