<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Mamet resolves dissonance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/</link>
	<description>A critical look at nutritional science and anything else that strikes my fancy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:11:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Kleisner</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-117648</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Kleisner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 05:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-117648</guid>
		<description>Actually, I just found some articles mentioning &quot;type three diabetes&quot; and Google gives a lot of hits for &quot;type 3 diabetes.&quot; Try searching for &quot;type-3-diabetes OR type-three-diabetes&quot; (remove the quotes). I get almost 14,000 hits for that. Only 22 for &quot;type three diabetes&quot; by itself. Here are some articles mentioning the theory that Alzheimer&#039;s is caused by insulin resistance in the brain. This theory really seems to be picking up steam.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/09/27/scidem127.xml
http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2582
http://health.dailynewscentral.com/content/view/0001969/53/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4315609.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I just found some articles mentioning &#8220;type three diabetes&#8221; and Google gives a lot of hits for &#8220;type 3 diabetes.&#8221; Try searching for &#8220;type-3-diabetes OR type-three-diabetes&#8221; (remove the quotes). I get almost 14,000 hits for that. Only 22 for &#8220;type three diabetes&#8221; by itself. Here are some articles mentioning the theory that Alzheimer&#8217;s is caused by insulin resistance in the brain. This theory really seems to be picking up steam.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/09/27/scidem127.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/09/27/scidem127.xml</a><br />
<a href="http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2582" rel="nofollow">http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2582</a><br />
<a href="http://health.dailynewscentral.com/content/view/0001969/53/" rel="nofollow">http://health.dailynewscentral.com/content/view/0001969/53/</a><br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4315609.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4315609.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Kleisner</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-117534</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Kleisner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-117534</guid>
		<description>Mike: &quot;I’ve long thought and Alzhiemer’s is nothing but diabetes of the brain.&quot;

That&#039;s exactly what Peter on the HyperLipid (high-fat) blog has argued. In fact, he has called Alzheimer&#039;s Disease &quot;type three diabetes.&quot; Do you think that name will catch on? :^)

http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2007/12/memes-and-g.html
http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2006/10/now-alzheimers-disease.html

&lt;em&gt;I suspect that in time the idea will catch on although I don&#039;t know if the name will.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: &#8220;I’ve long thought and Alzhiemer’s is nothing but diabetes of the brain.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what Peter on the HyperLipid (high-fat) blog has argued. In fact, he has called Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease &#8220;type three diabetes.&#8221; Do you think that name will catch on? :^)</p>
<p><a href="http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2007/12/memes-and-g.html" rel="nofollow">http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2007/12/memes-and-g.html</a><br />
<a href="http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2006/10/now-alzheimers-disease.html" rel="nofollow">http://high-fat-nutrition.blogspot.com/2006/10/now-alzheimers-disease.html</a></p>
<p><em>I suspect that in time the idea will catch on although I don&#8217;t know if the name will.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Naughton</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-117051</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Naughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-117051</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not exactly dissonance, but it&#039;s more bad science:  Now we&#039;re supposed to believe belly fat causes dementia.  Preposterous.  If anything, they have the same root cause, mostly likely chronically elevated insulin / high blood sugar.

http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1313537/belly_fat_linked_to_an_increased_risk_of_dementia/index.html?source=r_health

I&#039;m beginning to think Richard Stein -- who says this can all be prevented with a lowfat diet -- is one of the worst scientists around.  Mistakes were made, but not by him.

&lt;em&gt;Jesus wept.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not exactly dissonance, but it&#8217;s more bad science:  Now we&#8217;re supposed to believe belly fat causes dementia.  Preposterous.  If anything, they have the same root cause, mostly likely chronically elevated insulin / high blood sugar.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1313537/belly_fat_linked_to_an_increased_risk_of_dementia/index.html?source=r_health" rel="nofollow">http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1313537/belly_fat_linked_to_an_increased_risk_of_dementia/index.html?source=r_health</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think Richard Stein &#8212; who says this can all be prevented with a lowfat diet &#8212; is one of the worst scientists around.  Mistakes were made, but not by him.</p>
<p><em>Jesus wept.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116908</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116908</guid>
		<description>At least one quote in this article is on the right track.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/03/26/belly.dementia.ap/index.html

John

&lt;em&gt;I just finished reading the study in Neurology that your article is about.  Pretty interesting.  I&#039;ve long thought and Alzhiemer&#039;s is nothing but diabetes of the brain.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least one quote in this article is on the right track.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/03/26/belly.dementia.ap/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/03/26/belly.dementia.ap/index.html</a></p>
<p>John</p>
<p><em>I just finished reading the study in Neurology that your article is about.  Pretty interesting.  I&#8217;ve long thought and Alzhiemer&#8217;s is nothing but diabetes of the brain.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116737</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116737</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;You’re only following a low-carb diet and you get grief in social circles. Imagine what I have to endure being a major public proponent of such diets.&lt;/i&gt;

I can imagine and believe me, every public proponent of low carb has my sincerest graditude.  

Personally I wish I could do more to help spread the word but doing more than I do now (educating myself and few interested ears) means losing focus both on my work and my children, whom I homeschool. 

As an aside, I&#039;ve experienced an occasional response that when you are out of the mainstream that somehow it&#039;s enjoyable, cool, or easy &quot;to be a rebel&quot;. I&#039;ve often thought that people who have that response have never been in a position of opposition of the mainstream. Those who have done it on any level knows being out of the &quot;mainstream&quot; means extra work, awkward social situations, and being at odds with good people you count as friends. In other words, it taint no fun and I don&#039;t think any sane person would choose it unless there was something important on the line.

So thanks to you and others like you. I&#039;ve seen just a small slice of what you put up with and I&#039;m grateful for the sacrifice. There is no greater gift than the restoration of health. Without low carb I&#039;d be the depressed, overweight, mess of a no energy mother I was a few years ago.  (Now I&#039;m a high energy mess of a mother. ;) ) Keep up the great work and thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You’re only following a low-carb diet and you get grief in social circles. Imagine what I have to endure being a major public proponent of such diets.</i></p>
<p>I can imagine and believe me, every public proponent of low carb has my sincerest graditude.  </p>
<p>Personally I wish I could do more to help spread the word but doing more than I do now (educating myself and few interested ears) means losing focus both on my work and my children, whom I homeschool. </p>
<p>As an aside, I&#8217;ve experienced an occasional response that when you are out of the mainstream that somehow it&#8217;s enjoyable, cool, or easy &#8220;to be a rebel&#8221;. I&#8217;ve often thought that people who have that response have never been in a position of opposition of the mainstream. Those who have done it on any level knows being out of the &#8220;mainstream&#8221; means extra work, awkward social situations, and being at odds with good people you count as friends. In other words, it taint no fun and I don&#8217;t think any sane person would choose it unless there was something important on the line.</p>
<p>So thanks to you and others like you. I&#8217;ve seen just a small slice of what you put up with and I&#8217;m grateful for the sacrifice. There is no greater gift than the restoration of health. Without low carb I&#8217;d be the depressed, overweight, mess of a no energy mother I was a few years ago.  (Now I&#8217;m a high energy mess of a mother. <img src='http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) Keep up the great work and thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116576</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116576</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post.  LOL - I can relate because I was also a &quot;brain-dead&quot; liberal for while and moved to what I consider to be a more moderate political position.  My husband and I can no longer listen to NPR. We find ourselves frustrated on topics we have some knowledge of, such as nutrition.  

For instance, my husband caught himself yelling at the radio when a proposal was brought forth and seriously discussed how the state should be spending money on educating pre-schoolers to stop the spread of child obesity.  If you&#039;ve met any actual pre-schoolers *grin*, I think you&#039;re perfectly aware that their parents control what they eat.  You can spend a day &quot;educating&quot; them and if you offer them a chips and cupcake for a meal the next day, they&#039;d be eating that. I&#039;m not against nutrition education, it was frustration at the idea that  educating 4 year olds who pretty much have to eat what&#039;s presented is going to have a serious impact on childhood obesity.

Anyway, I agree that this is on topic as choosing low carb even today is much like converting from &quot;good hearted liberal&quot; (ie low fat and/or vegetarian) to the &quot;evil conservatives&quot; (ie a protein/meat based diet).  All I know is that I tend to in social circles minimize discussions of my diet to avoid controversy in a diverse group.  Low carb discussions seem to produce anger that I can only explain as &quot;religious zeal&quot;.

&lt;em&gt;You&#039;re only following a low-carb diet and you get grief in social circles.  Imagine what I have to endure being a major public proponent of such diets.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post.  LOL &#8211; I can relate because I was also a &#8220;brain-dead&#8221; liberal for while and moved to what I consider to be a more moderate political position.  My husband and I can no longer listen to NPR. We find ourselves frustrated on topics we have some knowledge of, such as nutrition.  </p>
<p>For instance, my husband caught himself yelling at the radio when a proposal was brought forth and seriously discussed how the state should be spending money on educating pre-schoolers to stop the spread of child obesity.  If you&#8217;ve met any actual pre-schoolers *grin*, I think you&#8217;re perfectly aware that their parents control what they eat.  You can spend a day &#8220;educating&#8221; them and if you offer them a chips and cupcake for a meal the next day, they&#8217;d be eating that. I&#8217;m not against nutrition education, it was frustration at the idea that  educating 4 year olds who pretty much have to eat what&#8217;s presented is going to have a serious impact on childhood obesity.</p>
<p>Anyway, I agree that this is on topic as choosing low carb even today is much like converting from &#8220;good hearted liberal&#8221; (ie low fat and/or vegetarian) to the &#8220;evil conservatives&#8221; (ie a protein/meat based diet).  All I know is that I tend to in social circles minimize discussions of my diet to avoid controversy in a diverse group.  Low carb discussions seem to produce anger that I can only explain as &#8220;religious zeal&#8221;.</p>
<p><em>You&#8217;re only following a low-carb diet and you get grief in social circles.  Imagine what I have to endure being a major public proponent of such diets.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116477</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116477</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  I have nothing worthwhile to contribute to this discussion other than to say I agree with Mamet&#039;s characterization of NPR.  I stopped listening for the same reason.

Totally unrelated, but every time I try to access past blogs it just keeps kicking me to the latest page.

&lt;em&gt;I&#039;m trying to get the blog fixed so that the archives can be accessed, but so far no one has been able to figure out exactly what the problem is.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  I have nothing worthwhile to contribute to this discussion other than to say I agree with Mamet&#8217;s characterization of NPR.  I stopped listening for the same reason.</p>
<p>Totally unrelated, but every time I try to access past blogs it just keeps kicking me to the latest page.</p>
<p><em>I&#8217;m trying to get the blog fixed so that the archives can be accessed, but so far no one has been able to figure out exactly what the problem is.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Blowhard</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116470</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Blowhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116470</guid>
		<description>Nice posting, fun comments, love your books and blogs. 

One teensy quibble: since Mamet is a man of the theater, I doubt very much that he had any trouble whatsoever sharing his conversion experience with the public. I think David Mamet is *eager* to share just about anything that occurs to him with the public!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice posting, fun comments, love your books and blogs. </p>
<p>One teensy quibble: since Mamet is a man of the theater, I doubt very much that he had any trouble whatsoever sharing his conversion experience with the public. I think David Mamet is *eager* to share just about anything that occurs to him with the public!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116457</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116457</guid>
		<description>No worries, Sam.  I&#039;m done commenting on this thread, and on that subject.  But I have to take a little umbrage that you think me a &quot;dork&quot; who wants to show &quot;how well-read&quot; I am.  You don&#039;t know me. I quote others &lt;i&gt;to give them credit&lt;/i&gt;, not to show I am well-read.  I don&#039;t like taking credit ( or even implying it)  for an idea that is not original with me.  I realize that this can be misinterpreted, and can be tedious to read, but I see it as the lesser of two evils.

Best,
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries, Sam.  I&#8217;m done commenting on this thread, and on that subject.  But I have to take a little umbrage that you think me a &#8220;dork&#8221; who wants to show &#8220;how well-read&#8221; I am.  You don&#8217;t know me. I quote others <i>to give them credit</i>, not to show I am well-read.  I don&#8217;t like taking credit ( or even implying it)  for an idea that is not original with me.  I realize that this can be misinterpreted, and can be tedious to read, but I see it as the lesser of two evils.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116444</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/miscellaneous/david-mamet-resolves-dissonance/#comment-116444</guid>
		<description>Doc, I sure hope you keep this blog on-topic and don&#039;t let it devolve into just another of the zillion joints on the net where dorks compete over how well-read they are.

&lt;em&gt;I think that issues involving cognitive dissonance and the confirmation bias are on topic as they help explain the seemingly inexplicable: how people can cling to the notion that low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets are healthful.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc, I sure hope you keep this blog on-topic and don&#8217;t let it devolve into just another of the zillion joints on the net where dorks compete over how well-read they are.</p>
<p><em>I think that issues involving cognitive dissonance and the confirmation bias are on topic as they help explain the seemingly inexplicable: how people can cling to the notion that low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets are healthful.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
