Kellogg…one of the worlds most ‘ethical’ companies?

kellogg.jpg

Ethisphere Magazine, a “national publication dedicated to illuminating the important correlation between ethics and profit,” recently named the Kellogg Company as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies, making Kellogg one of

the elite list of companies [that] were recognized for their strong leadership in ethics and compliance, advancement of industry discourse on social and ethical issues, and positive engagement in the communities in which they operate.

Ethical? Hmmm.

Let’s take a look at what the Kellogg Company produces:

With 2006 sales of almost $11 billion, Kellogg Company (NYSE: K) is the world’s leading producer of cereal and a leading producer of convenience foods, including cookies, crackers, toaster pastries, cereal bars, fruit snacks, frozen waffles, and veggie foods. The company’s brands include Kellogg’s, Keebler, Pop-Tarts, Eggo, Cheez-It, Nutri-Grain, Special K, Rice Krispies, Murray, Austin, Morningstar Farms, Famous Amos, Carr’s, Plantation, Ready Crust and Kashi. Kellogg products are manufactured in 17 countries and marketed in more than 180 countries around the world.

In searching through this list, I can’t find a single product that is actually healthful. In fact all, of them are dreadful. They are all what are referred to euphemistically as ‘convenience foods.’ I think a more accurate description would be junk foods.

I would venture to say that virtually every product Kellogg makes is a health destroyer. Which figures, since the company was founded by the brother of the vile charlatan John Harvey Kellogg (an action causing a breech in their relationship that was never repaired), whose sanitarium brought many, many of its patients to grief. As Hank Williams, Jr. sings, “It’s an ol’ family tradition.”

(If you want to read an entertaining and informative fictional treatment of J.H. Kellogg and his ilk, get a copy of the fabulously well-written The Road to Wellville and devour it. You may think that all the treatments and theories discussed in the book are fictional, but I can assure you they are not. Everything from Fletcherizing, to radiation treatment, to yogurt enemas, to major surgeries for non-existent bowel disorders, to womb manipulation took place as described. And don’t bother renting the movie–it sucks and has very little correlation to the book. On another note regarding womb manipulation…a little known fact of medical history is that up until the first part of the 20th century a large part of the time spent by many physicians in their practices was devoted to bringing their female patients to orgasm. Strange but true. If there is enough interest in learning more about this bizarre branch of medical practice, I’ll enlarge on the topic in a future post.)

What does make a company ethical? Is it how it treats its employees? Is it how it treats its customers? Is it how it treats the environment? (You can read Ethisphere Magazine’s selection process here under ‘Methodology.’)

If a company treats its employees wonderfully, is terrific to its customers, and is environmentally friendly, yet sells a toxic product that kills, is it still an ethical company? How about the tobacco companies? Are they ethical if they treat employees, customers, and the environment well?

keebler-elf-smaller.jpgI would posit that the Kellogg Company is worse than the tobacco companies. At present the tobacco companies promote their products to consenting adults who should know better. I know that these companies have subtle ways of getting their message out to kids that it’s cool to smoke, but the cereal and ‘convenience food’ manufacturers advertise directly to children. Their products are designed to be children-friendly and have cartoon characters on the boxes. Yet they’re filled with trans fats and high-fructose corn syrup, not anyone’s idea of a great diet for kids.

Maybe if the tobacco companies ditched the Marlboro Man and other such adult icons and instead labeled their products with pictures of the Keebler elves, they, too, would get a nomination to the list of the World’s Most Ethical Companies.

23 Responses to “Kellogg…one of the worlds most ‘ethical’ companies?”

  1. Karen Barber Fitz, August 14, 2008 at 1:46 pm

    Great posts here and the ‘Ethisphere’ model is in fact window dressing to further perpetuate opressive business practices of major corporations. If you look at the ‘most ethical’ companies (HSBC, GE?) they read like a ‘who’s who’ of preditory practices, off-shore labor and unethical practices.

    It doesn’t mean crap to celebrate these ‘well adjusted Nazis’ – more employees need to band together to boycot the products of ‘heartless assholes’ NOW!

  2. Desmondo, July 15, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Hey Guys, don’t let your cortisol be raised, it shows them they’ve been noticed.

    There is no such thing as bad publicity, there is only Brand Exposure.

    It’s Marketing, Marketing, Marketing by Kelloggs and many others – ‘cos it it as certain as Death & Taxes that that there is perceived “added value”, that is, a higher price mark-up charged on the Organic Product at all levels in the Distribution Chain.

    Even in a product with as little processing as milk, there is ALWAYS a higher store price asked for skim, “lo-fat” etc over the normal “full fat” product! Why? Higher added value.

    (BTW, it’s the same for “fish oils”, ” cod liver oil” and so on – the price premium for the “convenience” of encapsulation is quite staggering.)

    It’s neither ethical nor non-ethical, it is just making sure that another Manufacturer cannot get a leading Brand Image over another supplier and become an alternative supplier to the trade.

    Business as usual – plus ca change, just more of what your mother can choose.
    (Ignore, I’m light headed before completing my 1st day IF.)

    Bye – no response needed.

  3. kelloggs worker 294323, May 9, 2010 at 8:26 pm

    I agree with the anonymouse guy; I also work for kelloggs, their ethical ranking is absolutely a meaningless gesture decided by a meaningless source. It wasn’t wallstreet or the economist because their ethics compliance training falls short of valuable. They ask one questions like “Don’t you love kelloggs while you’re not breaking any laws” etc. the corporate rhetoric and policies make one realize “this is not a job, this is observational insight and hell on earth” and fuck cheezits