Late last night I was transferring some medical papers from my old moribund PC onto my Mac when I came across an article that infuriated me when it came out. Now it simply made me laugh, although I have to admit to at least a tinge of annoyance still.
As I’ve mentioned before, MD and I often feel like the Rodney Dangerfields of the low-carb diet biz or, worse yet, the Victor Flemings (don’t know who Victor Fleming is? Look him up and see what he did in 1939. And you don’t know who he is, right?). At any rate it seems that whenever low-carb diets are mentioned in a positive way, which, fortunately, that are more and more often these day, we and/or Protein Power never make the list. It’s always Atkins, South Beach and the Zone. And of those three, only one is a true low-carb diet. The other is a quasi, pansy low-carb diet, whose author goes around denying that his diet is a low-carb diet. The other isn’t a low-carb diet, since a diet in which 40 percent of the calories are made up of carbohydrate hardly qualifies for the modifier ‘low.’ But when it comes to attacking low-carb diets, somehow we always seem to make that list.
Now that I’ve gotten that out of my system (sorry for the whine), I can move on to the paper that attacks low-carb diets and in which we prominently figure. This article, published in the May 2000 issue of the Journal of the American College of Nutrition (free full text here), takes an ‘unbiased’ look at several different diets that were on the market at that time. The title says it all. Read more »